The offering of practice

The offering of practice means
always to live by the teachings of one's guru. But what happens
when the guru gives us advice that we do not wish to follow or that
contradicts Dharma and reason? The yardstick must always be
logical reasoning and Dharma reason. Any advice that contradicts
these is to be rejected. This was said by Buddha himself. If
one doubts the validity of what is being said, one should gently push
the point and clear all doubts.
This task becomes somewhat more sensitive in Highest Tantra, where
total surrender to the guru is a prerequiste; but even here the
surrender must be made only in a particular sense. If the guru
points to the East and tells you to go West, there is little alternative
but for the student to make a complaint. This should be done with
respect and humility however, for to show any negativity towards the
teacher is not a noble way of repaying his or her kindness.
Perception of faults in the guru should not cause us to feel
disrespect, for by demonstrating faults to us the guru is
actually showing us what we should abandon. At least this the
most useful attitude for us to take. An important point here is
that the disciple must have a spirit of sincere inquiry and must have
clear, rather than blind, devotion.
"Every action seen as perfect"
It is frequently said that the essence of training in guru yoga is
to cultivate the art of seeing everything the guru does as
perfect. Personally I myself do not like this to be taken too
far. Often we see written in the scriptures, "Every action seen as
perfect". However this phrase must be seen in the light of Shakyamuni's
own words: "Accept my teachings only after examining them as an analyst
buys gold. Accept nothing out of mere faith in me".
The problem with the practice of seeing everything the guru does as
perfect is that it very easily turns to poison for both the guru and
the disciple. Therefore, whenever I teach this practice, I always
advocate that the tradition of "every action seen as perfect" not be
stressed. Should the guru manifest unDharmic qualities or give
teachings contradicting Dharma, the instruction on seeing the spiritual
master as perfect must give way to reason and Dharma wisdom.
Take myself, for example. Because many of the previous Dalai
Lamas were great sages and I am said to be their reincarnation, and also
because in this lifetime I give frequent religious discourses, many
people place much faith in me, and in their guru yoga practice they
visualize me as a Buddha - I am also regarded by these people as their
secular leader. Therefore, this teaching of "every action seen as
perfect" can easily become poison for me in my relationship with my
people and in my effective administration. I could think to
myself, "They all see me as a Buddha, and therefore will accept anything
I tell them". Too much faith and imputed purity of perception can
quite easily turn things rotten.
The lives of ordinary practitioners
I always recommend that the teaching on seeing the guru's actions
as perfect should not be stressed in the lives of ordinary
practitioners. It would be an unfortunate affair if the
Buddhadharma, which is established by profound reasoning, were to take
second place to it.
Perhaps you will think:"The Dalai Lama has nor read the Lam
Rim scriptures. He does not know that there is no practice of
Dharma without the guru".
I am not being disrespectful to the Lam Rim teachings. A
student of the spiritual path should rely upon a teacher and should
meditate on that teacher's kindness and good qualities; but the teaching
on seeing his or her actiions as perfect can only be applied within the
context of the dharma as a whole and the rational approach to knowledge
that it advocates.
Beginners must treat it with caution
As the teaching on seeing the guru's actions as perfect is borrowed
from Highest Tantra and appears in the Lam Rim mainly to prepare the
trainee for tantric practice, beginners must treat it with
caution. As for spiritual teachers, if they misrepresent this
precept of guru yoga in order to take advantage of naive disciples,
their actions are like pouring the liquid fires of hell directly into
their stomachs.
The disciple must always keep reason and knowledge of Dharma as
principle guidelines. Without this approach it is difficult to
digest one's Dharma experiences. Make a thorough examination
before accepting someone as a guru, and even then follow that
teacher within the conventions of reason as presented by the Buddha.
The teachings on seeing the guru's
actions as perfect should largely be left for the practice of Highest
Tantra
The teachings on seeing the guru's actions as perfect should
largely be left for the practice of Highest Tantra, wherein they take on
a new meaning. One of the principle yogas of the tantric vehicle
is to see the world as a mandala of great bliss and oneself and all
others as Buddhas. Under these circumstances it becomes absurd to
think that you and everyone else are Buddhas, but your guru is not !
Actually, the more respect one is given the more humble one should
become, but sometimes this principle becomes reversed. A spiritual
teacher must guard himself or herself carefully and shoud remember the
words of Lama Drom Tonpa, "Use respect shown to you as a cause for
humility". This is the teacher's responsibility. The student
has the responsibility of using wisdom in his or her demonstration of
faith and respect.
We usually only observe those teachings that feed our delusions
and ignore those that would overcome them
A problem is that we usually only observe those teachings that feed
our delusions and ignore those that would overcome them. This
leniency can easily lead to one's downfall. This is why I say that
the teaching on seeing all the guru's actions as as perfect can be
poison. Many sectarian problems in TIbet were born and nourished
by it.
The First Dalai Lama wrote "The true spiritual master looks upon
all living beings with thoughts of love and shows respect to teachers of
all traditions alike. Such a one only harms delusion, the enemy
within".
The different traditions have arisen principally as branches of
skillful methods for trainees of varying capacities. If we take an
aspect of their teachings, such as the precept of "all actions seen as
perfect", and use it for sectarian purposes, how have we repaid the kind
masters for their kindness in giving and transmitting
Dharma ? Have we not disgraced them ? If we
misunderstand and mispractice their teachings, it will hardly please
them.
Similarly it is meritorious for a lama to perform rituals or give
initiations to benefit people, but if his or her motivation is only
material benefit, that person would be better off going into
business instead. Using the mask of Dharma to exploit people
is great harm.
We erect elaborate altars and make extensive pilgrimages, but
better than these is to remember the Buddha's teaching:
"Never create any negative action;
Always create goodness;
Aim all practices at cultivating the mind".
When our practice increases delusion, negativity and disturbed
states of mind, we know that something is wrong.
It is sometimes said that a major cause of the decline of
Buddhism in India eight hundred years ago was the practice of
vajrayana by unqualified people, and sectarianism caused by corruption
within the Sangha. Anyone teaching Tibetan Buddhism should keep
this in mind when they refer to this precept, "every action of the guru
is to be seen as perfect".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This adapted excerpt was first published
in Snow Lion magazine and is reproduced here with
permission. The excerpt is taken from the book published by Snow
Lion "The Path to Enlightenment" by His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Glenn
Mullin and the Third Dalai Lama. This is His Holiness' commentary
on The Essence of Refined Gold by the Third Dalai Lama, one of
the Eight Great Lam Rim texts.